The Lansing State Journal reports this morning that Ingham and Branch counties have sued Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems Inc., and a number of banks and mortgage companies, for unpaid transfer taxes on properties MERS purchased at foreclosure sales and later transferred to financial institutions.
According to Ingham County Register of Deeds Curtis Hertel Jr., although MERS buys the properties, when it later transfers ownership, it claims a transfer tax exemption for tranactions valued less than $100. Hetel believes that the county and state are owed “millions of dollars” in unpaid transfer taxes over the past decade.
From the LSJ:
Just what, exactly, MERS owns and the rights that ownership gives it have become contested questions as the foreclosure crisis has continued.
The company may claim to hold title to tens of millions of U.S. mortgages, but it invests no money in those loans and holds no interest in the debt underlying them.
For that reason, Michigan’s Court of Appeals ruled earlier this year that the company could not foreclose by advertisement, that is, could not foreclose without taking the case before a judge.
“There are some really profound contradictions built into the DNA of the MERS system,” said Christopher Peterson, a professor at the University of Utah’s S.J. Quinney College of Law, who has written on MERS.
“When the financial institutions try to use MERS as a tool to foreclose on your house, they will commonly represent that MERS has an ownership stake that justifies allowing them to do that,” he said, “but when they talk to the county register of deeds offices about whether or not they have to pay fees or taxes, they claim not to have the ownership interest.”
The LSJ reports that counties in six other states have filed similar suits.