ADB panel reprimands Baskin for misconduct

An Attorney Discipline Board hearing panel has issued an order of reprimand to high-profile attorney and Oakland University Trustee Henry Baskin after he admitted that he had a sexual relationship with a client while representing her in a divorce action.

Baskin represented the client from 1999 to 2004.

According to the panel’s report, Baskin admitted that his conduct violated Michigan Rule of Professional Conduct 1.7(b)(1), in that under the circumstances of the case, “a lawyer could not reasonably believe that the representation might not be adversely affected by the lawyer’s personal interests.”

Robert Edick, the Deputy Grievance Administrator presented the case to the hearing panel. Edick argued that Baskin should be suspended for his misconduct.

The hearing panel concluded that Baskin should have known better.

“Although there is no evidence of actual injury to the client, the potential for injury under these circumstances is clear to any lawyer, and certainly to someone with respondent’s experience,” the hearing panel wrote.

“Indeed, this experience caused this panel to consider imposing a suspension, but we have concluded that Standard 4.33 is applicable and that the imposition of a reprimand adequately serves to protect the public, the courts and the profession,” the panel concluded.

Baskin was assessed costs and fees totaling $2,468.

Update: Edick said the Attorney Grievance Commission has not made a decision whether to appeal the level of discipline imposed by the hearing panel. Any appeal would be heard first by the Attorney Discipline Board.

Advertisements

Stefani may face perjury charges over Kilpatrick messages

Michael Stefani, the lawyer who represented police officers in the whistle-blower lawsuit that exposed former Mayor Kwame Kilpatrick’s lies under oath, may himself face perjury charges, reports The Detroit News.

More from The News:

Stefani admitted Thursday he gave copies of the infamous text messages to the Detroit Free Press, bringing to an abrupt halt the Attorney Discipline Board proceedings against the lawyer who represented the police officers who sued Kilpatrick. The revelation could bring more disciplinary charges against Stefani, who already faces punishment for his role in the scandal.

“His admission provides evidence that he provided false statements in two previous sets of testimony and may require investigation of perjury,” said Robert Edick, a lawyer acting as prosecutor in the state’s ethics case against Stefani.

The hearing already was aimed at deciding whether Stefani should be punished for violating a judge’s orders that the text messages be handed over to the judge first, and whether Stefani was obligated to tell the judge the messages indicated Kilpatrick and his then-chief of staff, Christine Beatty, lied under oath.